Yesterday the Supreme Court approved the Federal Goverment's proposed legislation to permit the marriage of same-sex couples in Canada.
The court said that the power to change the definition of marriage lay with the Federal Government, not the individual provinces (six provinces have already ruled in favour of same-sex marriages), and that it fits smoothly with evolution of the law.
From a religious standpoint, those who are against gay marriage cannot be forced to wed same-sex couples.
According to many, it states that the bill will be pushed through and approved in the new year when Parliament resumes in January. This will make Canada the third country to allow same-sex marriage, behind Belgium and The Netherlands.
(some notes from my paraphrasing above taken from today's Globe and Mail.)
Even here, at work, people are agreeing that with the stipulation that religious figures are not forced to marry same-sex couples when it conflicts with their morals, it's the best of both worlds.
I think this is a step in the right direction. This is not a restriction, this is a freedom for millions of people.
Welcome to Canada. :)
The court said that the power to change the definition of marriage lay with the Federal Government, not the individual provinces (six provinces have already ruled in favour of same-sex marriages), and that it fits smoothly with evolution of the law.
From a religious standpoint, those who are against gay marriage cannot be forced to wed same-sex couples.
According to many, it states that the bill will be pushed through and approved in the new year when Parliament resumes in January. This will make Canada the third country to allow same-sex marriage, behind Belgium and The Netherlands.
(some notes from my paraphrasing above taken from today's Globe and Mail.)
Even here, at work, people are agreeing that with the stipulation that religious figures are not forced to marry same-sex couples when it conflicts with their morals, it's the best of both worlds.
I think this is a step in the right direction. This is not a restriction, this is a freedom for millions of people.
Welcome to Canada. :)
no subject
no subject
And the disclaimer about "...cannot be forced to wed same-sex couples" hardly seems necessary. Can't a minister/priest/whoever simply pick and choose what marriages they do and don't want to perform anyway...?
no subject
Such an interesting question, so much deeper than it looks. Does this mean a church (i.e. Anglican or Catholic or Baptist, not an individual church) can still ban same-sex marriage, even if the individual priest/minister/rabbi/officiant/whatever would like to perform the marriage? I don't much like that, but I guess that kind of thing is always the price of belonging to a denomination.
Anyhoo . . . yay, Canada!
no subject
they decided that heterosexual marriage being the only state-sanctified household was discrimatory, not just against gays, but against say, two friends living together or two sisters. it was argued that insurance companies/governements should give benefits to people who're part of any household, not just parents/siblings.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Now I live in Nova Scotia, and he lives in Ontario, so I guess I'll never convince him. I'm a language geek--fluent in French and Spanish, pick up bits of whatever else I can, but the best I've managed to do toward learning dutch is a beginner's course in German and a vague dream of spending some serious time in the Netherlands one of these days and figuring it out. I'm a fast study with languages, though my German's pretty non-existant now since I took it in my last year of university when I was busy with other things.
Blah . . . someday!
no subject
Well most of belgium still speaks dutch as well, (usually even better than them dutchies) I'm sure it'll stay around for a while :)
no subject